After reading Cisco blog and Bloomberg report, I can't believe Apple uses the argument of "first cell phone with iPhone name". A phone is a phone, whether that's based on wireless or wired or cell or VoIP. Would Apple just let purely Ogg-based music player use iPod name, because such a player would be "first Ogg-based music player" ? IANAL, and I know law sometimes has funny implications and consequences, but this has to be BLINDINGLY OBVIOUS that Apple is infrining upon Cisco's trademark.
I'd say this is typical Apple arrogance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment